Chapter 17
“After six days” — a
literal lapse of time before the prophecy is fulfilled; “Jesus taketh Peter,
James, and John his brother, and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart.”
The word “apart” means by themselves, just the three of them.
Verse 2 — “And was
transfigured before them.” The word “transfigured” in the Greek means to change
the external form or the outward visible form. It means an outer
transformation. Jesus is changed on the outside. This is still the incarnate
Christ but the change is made so that the glory of Christ will appear and so
that Peter, James and John will get a preview of the second advent of Christ;
they will see Him as He will appear at the second advent; “and his face did
shine.” The word “did shine” means to be animated, to be gloriously animated,
which indicates that during the first advent the face of Jesus Christ was not
unusually animated, but When He comes back again there will be this fantastic
inner beauty shining forth; “as the sun, and his raiment was as white as
light.” In other words, whatever He was wearing it was beautiful, translucent,
glamorous.
Verse 3 — “And,
behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elijah talking with him.” Moses and
Elijah are the heralds of the second advent of Jesus Christ. These are the two
witnesses which are found in Revelation chapter eleven, verses three through
twelve. They are Jews and they are going to be a part of the second advent
picture, and they are talking with the Lord Jesus Christ.
Verse 4 — “Then
answered Peter.” Notice that if there are more than two people around it is
Peter who does the talking! Later on he will have something to say, in fact he
learned to talk but he didn’t have any content yet. When he gets some content
he will begin to give some wonderful messages as on the day of Pentecost in
Acts chapters two and three. Apparently in two messages Peter led about five or
six thousand people to the Lord. “Lord [he recognises always His deity], it is
good for us to be here.” The word for “good” is not human good and it is not
divine good, it means free from defects. So he is actually saying, “Things are
very nice up here.” It connotes the idea of wonderful environment and Peter
wants to stay right there. The environment is excellent, here is Moses and Elijah
and the Lord and two other disciples, and it is just a nice situation all the
way around. Another reason why it is pleasant to Peter: he always got along
with John, they were old mates who were compatible. As far as Peter was
concerned he was in good company and what he wants to do is to perpetuate this
lovely environment. However, there is just one thing that Peter has forgotten:
pleasant circumstances do not make happiness for the believer. The beautiful
thing about the believer who has doctrine is that he can enjoy his pleasant
circumstances. He can enjoy people, he can enjoy circumstances, and he can
really enjoy happiness. However, the beauty of Bible doctrine is that it is
designed for happiness in adversity as well. And what Peter is really saying
here is, Lord let’s stick it out here, let’s forget all about all that mess
down below, down in the valley! In other words, Peter wanted a superficial
mountain-top experience and he wanted to perpetuate this, instead of carrying
his mountain-top around in his frontal lobe. In other words, what Peter is
saying is that happiness is a pleasant set of circumstances, and what the Lord
is going to say to him is happiness is what you think. If you carry doctrine
around in your frontal lobe you are going to be happy. But if you depend upon
pleasant circumstances for happiness you will not find happiness there. We make
our happiness on the inside by the use of Bible doctrine; we do not create our
happiness by improving our environment.
“if thou wilt” — “if” is a
first class condition; “if” and I know you intend to do this. And Peter assumes
it is so
nice up here that the Lord is going to
continue this thing. In other words, again Peter is almost telling the Lord.
Peter is going all out for perfect environment; “let us make here three tents;
one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elijah.” This is the bribery
system. In other words, Lord if you will stay here we will make you nice homes
here. The beautiful thing about the grace of God on this occasion is that the
Lord just simply shut Peter up.
Verse 5 — “While he
yet spake.” Peter was going to say a lot more but he didn’t get it all out;
“behold a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud,
which said.” Now God the Father is going to give Peter a lesson; “this is [this
keeps on being] my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him [keep on
listening to him].” You listen to Him, Peter!
Verse 6 — “And when
the disciples [Peter, James, and John] heard it, they fell down on their face,
and were frightened.”
Verse 7 — “And Jesus
came and touched them, and said, Arise, and be not afraid [literally, stop
being afraid].”
Verse 8 — “And when
they had lifted up their eyes.” Notice they didn’t get up, they just looked up;
“they saw no man save [except] Jesus only.” And that was a lesson. What Jesus
Christ has to say is important, and of you are going to learn it then you had
better get your eyes on the Lord. One reason some people never learn doctrine
is because they always have their eyes on people. People disillusion them.
Verse 9 — “And as they
came down from the mountain, Jesus charged them.” The word “charge” means to
command, it doesn’t mean that someone got on a horse and charged!; “saying,
Tell the vision to no man, until the Son of Man be risen again from the dead” don’t
tell anyone about this until the resurrection. This is very important.
It was a very long
time after the resurrection before Peter felt like talking about it, but he
finally opened up. Peter finally decided he could talk about this when he knew
that he was dying — 2 Peter 1:16, “For we have not followed cunningly devise
fables [myths], when we made known unto you the power and the coming of our
Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses to his majesty.” There were three
people who were eyewitnesses, Peter, James and John, and he is referring to the
mount of transfiguration.
2 Peter 1:17 — “For he
received from [from the immediate source of] God the Father honour and glory,
when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory [describing the
essence box], This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased” — quotation
from Matthew 17:5. So Peter says, We heard the voice of God the Father and we
saw Jesus transfigured.
2 Peter 1:18 — “And
this voice which came from heaven we heard, when we were with him [with Christ]
in the holy mount.”
2 Peter 1:19 — “We
also have a more sure word of prophecy.” “We have” is present linear
aktionsart: we keep on having, we have it in the Word of God, we have it in
Bible doctrine; “more sure” is literally, more reliable. What is more reliable
than seeing it with your eyes and hearing it with your ears? What you have
written in the Word of God today, the Word of God which liveth and abideth
forever, is more real than seeing it with your eyes and hearing it with your
ears. Jesus didn’t teach the whole realm of doctrine. What we now have in
writing is more than Jesus taught in three years. God’s Word is in writing and
we can read it.
“whereunto ye do well
that ye take heed (as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day
dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts)” — to take heed in your hearts
means to learn it. You do well to learn doctrine, it is more reliable than what
you see with your eyes and hear with your ears.
In the parenthesis we
have a beautiful picture of the Lord Jesus Christ and His second advent but our
purpose her is not to analyse it but relate it to the transfiguration. Peter
saw it; Peter heard it; but what he saw and what he heard is not as reliable as
found in the Word of God.
Verse 20 — “Knowing
this first, that no prophecy of the scripture [about the second advent]
originates from one’s own explanation” — corrected translation. In other words,
we didn’t dream this up.
Verse 21 — “For the
prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as
they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.” The Bible is more reliable because
it is God’s Word. If you have doctrine in the frontal lobe whatever you see in
life, whatever you hear, you are able to discern whether it is God’s plan,
whether it is Satanic, or man’s imagination, or man’s devices, or whatever it
happens to be.
In effect Peter is
saying he has finally learned the lesson of the mount of transfiguration.
Doctrine was here before he came; doctrine will be here after he dies. The Word
of God liveth and abideth forever.
The failure to
understand doctrine.
Verse 10 — “And his
disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elijah must first
come?” Immediately they hit Him with a doctrinal question. Apparently they are
confused because the scribes are teaching one thing and Jesus has been teaching
something else from the mount of transfiguration. Jesus Christ came first to
the world and this is what they can’t understand. On the mount of
transfiguration Elijah came after Jesus had been on the earth. They can’t work
this out at all because Malachi 4:5,6 make it very clear that Elijah was to
come before Christ. The scribes have been teaching this. Now everything is
quite different. They have seen from the mount of transfiguration that instead
of coming first Christ came first, and just like so many believers they get all
shook up because they do not understand everything at one time. Sometimes they
can’t wait for answers on these things and often they get so upset that they
simply fall apart if they can’t find an answer right now. But if people are
patient and wait long enough all of the answers are forthcoming.
At this point the
disciples have been told of the importance of Bible doctrine and now they have
a problem because they can’t understand a point, and this has them in panic
palace. So Jesus immediately clarifies the situation.
Verse 11 — “And Jesus
answered and said.” This phrase “answered and said” is very common in the New
Testament. What makes it unusual here is not the way we have it in the English
but the fact that the word “answered” is always an aorist passive participle,
whereas the word “said” is always aorist active indicative. The problem here
is, why the passive voice? It is always translated like an active voice but
actually it is a passive voice and the passive voice receives the action of the
verb. The passive voice has a purpose, it indicates thought. In other words,
thinking before you answer. It should be translated, “And Jesus received an
answer and said.” In other words, He thought it over and then He answered. This
is an idiom in the Greek which indicates the answer is given as a result of
thought. The thought is always based on a statement of the Word or becomes the
Word of God itself, as in this case. “Elijah
truly shall first come, and restore all things.” The word “first” does not
occur in the original and what Jesus actually said was: “Elijah shall come and
restore all things.” What He is saying is that there are two advents instead of
one, and in each advent Jesus Christ is the King. The King must be preceded by
His herald. He is going to amplify this now and show them that for the first
advent John the Baptist is the herald and for the second advent the heralds are
Elijah and Moses. Elijah and Moses are going to come at the proper time. The
scribes were theologians and as theologians their system of theology was not
biblically oriented because they only believed in one advent. They were further
disoriented in their theology and in their thinking by the fact that the last
two verses in the Old Testament talk about Elijah coming. Now, Elijah does not
come first. He comes at the second advent as a herald and his counterpart is
John the Baptist for the first advent. This is developed very quickly in the
rest of this particular paragraph.
Verse 12 — “But I say
unto you, That Elijah is come already and they knew him not.” Elijah in this
case is John the Baptist; “but have done unto him whatsoever they listed.” The
word “listed” means to do something based on emotion. Emotionally they got so
worked up that they killed him, which indicates what happens when emotions get
out of line. Emotions should be your slave and not your master.
“Likewise shall also the Son of Man suffer of
them.” He is indicating that when the Jews team up with the Romans to put Jesus
on the cross the basis for doing so will be emotionalism, the same kind of
emotionalism that you find in the tongues movement. Principle: Emotions as a
slave are wonderful; emotions as your master distort everything in life and
lead to misery in every field. When emotion is teamed up with religion it
becomes a monster. It is the monster of religion that destroys not only Jesus
Christ but before Him John the Baptist.
Verse 13 — the
disciples finally got it. “Then the disciples understood that he spake unto
them of John the Baptist.”
Verse 14 — we are
going to see failure to apply doctrine, failure in the faith-rest technique.
“And when they were come to the multitude, there came to him [to Jesus] a
certain man, kneeling down to him, and saying.” Here is a man in distress. This
man has previously been in contact with nine of the disciples. Judas Iscariot
is excluded. Up on the mount of transfiguration there were three of the
disciples. Down below there were nine disciples who couldn’t handle a case of
demon possession (demon-induced illness) and we now are going to discover why.
The three disciples up on the mountain had a lot to learn and Peter expressed
their fallacy, they wanted to stay up there because it was pleasant. It can be
pleasant wherever you are under any conditions, under any circumstances. Now
notice what happened down below when they were up on the mountain top. Beginning
is this verse 14 down to verse 21, we have the failure of the disciples, their
failure to apply doctrine.
Verse 15 — “Lord.” He
recognises that Jesus Christ is God and being God He can do something about the
situation; “have mercy.” His approach is correct because it is based on grace.
He doesn’t earn or deserve anything from God so when he says, “have mercy” he
is on the right track. Mercy means that this man is oriented to grace. Two
things about this man: he is a believer because he calls Jesus Christ “Lord”;
he has been out of line and yet he has the good sense to come to the Lord Jesus
Christ, he has enough doctrine to know that you can always come to God on the
basis of grace.
“on my son: for he is lunatick.”
The Greek word for lunatic means to be moonstruck, and it is actually a Greek
word for mental illness. This man was demon-possessed and it resulted in mental
illness.
Demon-induced
illness
Basically there are three sources of illness. One of
them is physiologically-induced illness, one is psychologically
induced-illness, psychosomatics, and the third is demon-induced illness.
1. Satan produced
illness in Job — Job 2:6-8; God permitted it but Satan produced it.
2. A woman who had a
disease for eighteen years had it through demon possession — Luke 13:11-16.
3. Satan uses demons
to produce disease — Matthew 12:22; Acts 10:38.
4. Abnormal behaviour
and psychotics (certain types) is caused by demon possession, as in Mark
chapter five.
5. There are certain
kinds, not all, of diseases such as deafness, dumbness, paralysis, which are
caused by demon possession. This does not mean that everyone who is deaf and
everyone who is dumb is demon possessed, it just simply means that there are
some cases which are caused by demon possession, as per Matthew 9:32,33; 12:22;
Mark 9:5, 17, 18, and many other passages.
6. When demon
possession causes illness the removal of the demon causes healing. Who can
remove demons? Satan can remove his own demons. God often removes the demons.
Satan will always pull his demon out when one of his own crowd is handling the
healing meeting. We are talking about demon-induced illness.
“sore vexed” — simply
means he has it bad; “for oftentimes he falls in the fire, and oft into the
water.”
Verse 16 — in the
absence of Jesus this man had brought his son to the nine disciples, and they
of course fell flat on their faces. “And I brought him to thy disciples” — it
by means of faith-rest.
Verse 17 — the first
rebuke. “Then Jesus answered and said, O faithless [lack of the faith-rest] and
perverse.” The word “perverse” means corrupted. It is a perfect passive
participle and it means corrupted or distorted. The perfect tense indicates
that while there was doctrine there it had been distorted, it had been
corrupted. It suggests that perhaps this doctrine had stayed in the frontal
lobe but they did not think about it they did not meditate they did not study,
they did not concentrate, and so this doctrine had been distorted until it was
neutralised; “generation” [these Jews who are disciples], how long shall I be
with you [how long shall I suffer you]?” He has been with them now for about
two years and they haven’t learned a thing. He has taught them the faith-rest
technique many times and yet they have completely failed; “bring him hither to
me,” present active imperative, which means bring him now.
Verse 18 — the second
rebuke. “And Jesus rebuked [told him to get out] the devil [demon]; and he [the
demon] departed out of him: and the child was cured from that very hour.” The
removal of the demon, the source of the illness, removes the illness.
Verse 19 — “Then came
the disciples to Jesus apart, and said, Why could not we cast him out?
Verse 20 — “And Jesus
said unto them [the disciples], Because of your unbelief.” Actually the word is
not unbelief but “because of your little bit of faith.” They had a little faith
but they didn’t have enough faith to be operational in this case; “for verily.”
Every time we find the word “verily” when Jesus uses it, it means He is now
going to give a point of doctrine. It is the same as “Thus saith the Lord” in
the Old Testament; “I say unto you, If [third class condition: maybe yes, maybe
no] you have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say to this mountain.”
Now He takes a situation which is difficult compared to the demon-induced
illness; “Remove [go away].” There is an analogy here. There was the demon and
now there is the mountain. They could have said to the demon, Go away, or you
could say to the mountain, Go away. Jesus said to the demon, Go away. The
disciples could say to the mountain if they have enough faith, Go away. But it
must be done under the operation of the faith-rest technique. So the mountain
is an analogy to the demon.
“to yonder place; and
it shall remove,” the demon will get up and go; “and nothing shall be
impossible for you.” Nothing is impossible for a mature and well-developed
faith-rest technique. To illustrate, let’s start with something which is
impossible for the human race — happiness in time. Happiness eludes us. It is
impossible for people to be happy on this earth but it becomes very possible
under the use of the faith-rest technique. In fact any believer can have
happiness anywhere, any time, under any circumstances.
Verse 21 — this verse
is not found in the original text at all. The King James version was finished
in the early part of the seventeenth century. It was taken from series of
manuscripts that go back to the 10th century AD, and this series of manuscripts
was called Textus Receptus. Textus Receptus had been terribly corrupted but
today we have over 5000 manuscripts that go back to the second, third, fourth,
and fifth centuries, and in none of these do we find this verse. This verse was
a corruption.
Verses 22-27, doctrine
is the only way to happiness.
Verse 22 — “And while
they abode in Galilee, Jesus said unto them, The Son of Man shall be betrayed
into the hands of men.”
Verse 23 — “And they
shall kill him, and on the third day he shall be raised again.” He has been
teaching and teaching and teaching this, and yet … “And they were exceeding
sorry.” If you want to be miserable in this life just let your emotions run
your life. The words “exceeding sorry” means they were emotionally sincere.
They didn’t want Jesus to go to the cross, it affected their maudlin
sentimentalism. They didn’t want anything to happen to Him, they really revered
Him. If they had had their way we wouldn’t have had the blood of the cross by
which we are saved. This comes from sincerity combined with emotionalism and when
you have the two it adds up to something that is very simple: stupidity.
[Emotion + sincerity = stupidity] Emotions are a lot of fun as long as you make
them your slave, but when they rule you then you get into trouble and you
couldn’t be further from happiness. Here they are on the verge of learning
something great about doctrine and yet what do they do with it? As soon as the
disciples get a little doctrine they go all to pieces, they are terribly sorry
about the whole thing. Last time it was Peter who said, “Let this not be unto thee.”
Now they all get on the same bandwagon, even though Jesus said to Peter: Get thee
behind me Satan. They were “exceeding sorry,” and the word “exceeding” is the
adverb, it expresses strong emotion. “They were sorry” is an aorist passive
indicative, and the passive voice indicates that they received this emotion,
and they allowed it to control them instead of being controlled by doctrine.
Jesus has been firing doctrine at them but down in their souls was emotion and
instead of responding, building doctrine on doctrine, they just allowed emotion
to grow up and choke out doctrine. When that happens emotion becomes the master
and you are minus happiness, and the only way to get plus happiness is for
doctrine to be the reality and then you have +H (happiness). If you are going
to have happiness it has to come through doctrine. The Bible must be more real
than what you see, what you feel, what you touch, and so on. Doctrine has to be
the reality.
Verse 23 — Jesus gets
an indirect visit from the “Internal Revenue Department.” Capernaum was the
headquarters. “And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute
[the tax collectors] came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute
[taxes]?”
Verse 25 — “He saith,
Yes. And when he [Peter] was come into the house, Jesus prevented [stopped]
him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take
custom or tribute? [two kinds of taxes] of their own children, or of
strangers?” Note: This cannot be understood from the English.
The word “children”
refers to children of the royal family, and the word “stranger” refers to
citizens. So Jesus stops Peter at the door and asks: “Of whom do they collect
taxes? Do they collect taxes from the children, which is the royal family, or
do they collect from the citizens of the country?”
What is the answer?
The citizens. You tax the citizens, the royal family is exempt. And Jesus is in
the royal family, He is the son of David. Jesus is actually exempt from taxation.
He is going to pay His taxes anyway and He is going to pay Simon’s too. Why? He
does not want Simon to be worried, He wants Simon to be strong. You can’t have
doctrine in the frontal lobe and be worried at the same time, and Simon is
about to fall apart. Simon has this income tax on his mind, it has come to
haunt him.
Verse 26 — “Peter saith
unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children [of the
royal family] free [exempt].”
Verse 27 —
“Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them, go thou to the sea, and cast an
hook, and take up the fish that first cometh up; and when thou hast opened his
mouth, thou shalt find a piece of money: that take, and give unto them for me
and for thee.”